Search
Feeds
Recent Posts
- Nailing the Lib Dems
- The Government's First Green Betrayal
- Grand Designs on Sustainable Housing
- Caroline Lucas makes Green Party history
- Greens poised for their biggest ever vote
- This election could be democracy's big chance
- Citizens challenge hung parliament 'horror' message
- Green issues are sidelined as the Big Party Circus rolls on
- Windpower to the people
- Worse than the worst case
- Education, Education, Education
- The war of words over home-produced electricity feed-in tariffs could cost dearly
- The Landfill Prize
- M&S set a sustainable benchmark for the retail world
Categories
- Aviation
- Built Environment
- China
- Climate change
- Consumption
- Crime
- Economics
- Energy
- Farming
- Genetic modification
- Government
- Health
- Housing
- Innovation
- News
- Politics
- Population
- Retail
- SD History
- Society
- Sustainable Food
- Transport
- USA
- Waste
Archives
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
Articles
Other Blogs
News Links
Organisations
« No more niches – we need sustainable innovation at scale | Main | The Landfill Prize »
M&S set a sustainable benchmark for the retail world
I spoke at the annual M&S Suppliers’ Conference on Tuesday, which took place in Kensington Town Hall. This venue has a particular resonance for me as it was where the votes for the 1979 and 1984 European elections were counted – and every time I’m back there, I can’t help but recall that sense of consternation that so few people seemed to be prepared, at that time, to put their cross in the Green Party box!
Twenty-six years on and it seemed as if the M&S Suppliers were all voting enthusiastically for the updated version of Plan A! And that was not just because Sir Stuart Rose made a very powerful pitch telling them all that this was their reality whether they liked it or not. By the end of the day, they would certainly have had an unnerving sense of bars being raised all around them, in terms of production standards, transparency, reporting, innovation and so on.
Plan A was launched three years ago, and instantly captured people’s imagination. The combination of carbon neutral and zero waste to landfill pledges, the 100 Action Points, the commitment to invest £200 million, and the sense of all this being at the core of the company rather than being grafted on made an immediate impact. It also gave Plan A the kind of brand profile that took it way beyond the usual corporate responsibility strategies.
Three years on, the £200 million cost has been turned into a £50 million contribution to profit. Forty-five of the Action Points have been delivered, and another 80 have been added on. The ambition level has been ratcheted up several notches, with M&S now committing to becoming the world’s most sustainable (major) retailer by 2015.
Forum for the Future has worked closely with M&S throughout this time, so we are not exactly disinterested parties, but Plan A does provide the benchmark for the whole of the retail world. It’s visionary, it’s applied, it’s comprehensive (as in covering all the sustainability bases), and it’s succeeding in getting whole-company buy-in, through the high level “How We Do Business” Committee, chaired (and driven!) by Sir Stuart Rose.
So it’s well worthwhile checking out the new version of Plan A, available at: http://plana.marksandspencer.com/media/pdf/planA-2010.pdf
Posted by Jonathon Porritt on March 11, 2010 11:50 AM | Permalink
Comments (1)
Highly commendable effort by M&S no doubt, but there are a some points we should remember
Firstly Stuart Rose's position ( erstwhile) as CEO and Chairman does not sit well with best Governance practice and has disturbed some stakeholders.
Secondly, I have always been uncomfortable with the Plan A concept and there being no alternatives, the revised Plan A is in fact Plan B because it has altered, a small point but it undermines some of the arrogant thinking that permeates through M&S and their inability to react to external changes unless they have been internalised (and rationalised) first.
Thirdly, I wonder by raising the Bar, as you say how many Suppliers will be forced out of business due to the lack of end consumer buy in to this concept, and how sympathetic are M&S going to be with this issue (maybe sharing the profits of Plan A (revised) down the Supply chain.)
The overarching concern here is that the cynics will say that M&S are following the green zeitgeist and treading a well worn sustainability path, when in fact they are going to leave less resilient suppliers in their wake.I am sure this was a concern at your meeting and I wonder what Plan M&S have to cope with a potential loss of ethical suppliers who may not be as lean and agile as M&S in adopting revisions to Plan A
This is also against a background of general economic lassitude and consumers (maybe) not wishing to pay ethical premiums in prices for everyday commodities.
Good luck to M&S in all this, I just hope they manage to shade their arrogance and be sympathetic to their suppliers dilemma.
Plan A is not just about shareholder value, or is it?
Posted by Len Jones | March 12, 2010 10:21 AM
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.jonathonporritt.com/jpblog/mt-tb.cgi/126
